Monday 24 September 2018
RIND SURVIVAL CAMP
Jezierzyce Sł. 2018
Arena & Accommodation
Jezierzyce Sł. 2017
Set 1 Clip 2
Register to read more ...
Unsportsmanlike foul. According to the new rules. The ofensive player don't want to play the ball. He want only to stop fastbreake. UF!
According to the new rules this is an UF!
Good help from new lead although he is not responsible and should have let the call to center or trail
Unsportsmanlike Foul - C3
No call, contact has no influnece on RSBQ..
Good call unsportsmanlike foul for white player
I would like to learn on the camp, whether or not the philosophy has changed since last year, but now I call this type of contact as 'no call', because the RSBQ was not impacted.
In my opinion this contact doesn't influence RSBQ of the dribbler. No call
UF for stoping transition - C3 - An unnecessary contact caused by defensive player in order to stop the progress of the offensive team in transition. C primary
UF as per the new rules, fouled to stop transition.
- New Rule 2017 - is an unsprotsmanlike foul
Small contact don´t affect the fastbreak - for me NO CALL with primary competence C! If call this should be definitely UF with new rules in this season - unnecessary contact to stop the transition.
USF, according to the new rules criteria.
New Rule - is an unsprotsmanlike foul in order to prevent the offensive team progressing up the court in transition.
I think last season would be rsbq rule applied for this call, but from this season probably most of the times will be a uf foul.
Small contact not really affected offensive player, but none devfensive move and trying to catch player with extended arms.
Very interesting to discuss i think. I think, this call depends on the criteria of the game. Just to have no-call due to better game flow in fastbreak for the spectators is not a criteria. I agree that if we call something, it should be U-foul, because the criteria for it is there = C1. In the end I would probably have had a no call. Lead should stay out from this play - center call.
has no influence on a RSBQ player with the ball. Imo no call
I think we should leave this contact without any call. It was "mosquito" contact which has no influence on a RSBQ player with the ball.
No call and not for L. This is for C and T could help.
According to new rules (C3), this is an unsportsmanlike foul. It’s Center’s primary. However, Center’s view is blocked by another offensive player so good help call from Lead.
No call. Defender play didn't change anything in RSBQ.
As Robert Cibulka says no call.
No call because contact was small and did not affect the offenders movement (no disadvantage). According to new criteria it is a U if you make a call "unneccessary contact to stop the transition". Lead should not call. The foul is for C or T to call.
An unnecessary contact caused by defensive player in order to stop the progress of the offensive team in transition. Unsportsmanlike foul.
C3- UF for stoping transition, (reaching a cross the player where you not anywhere near the ball) C primary AOR, good help from new L
No call because the contact didn't affect offender's movement. In a fast break situation like this one, C should be responsible for the call, not L.
I agree with CIBULKA ROBERT
According to RSBQ rule, offensive player didn´t lose his speed or balance and either there were 3 on 1 player situation ( fast brake)
MY CALL: NO CALL
No call for me. While it could be explained as UF using the new criteria "unneccessary contact to stop the transition", the contact seems very small to me and doesn't affect the player with the ball. Also C has primary on this play and doesn't blow the whistle. New L is running away looking over his shoulder, but this is not his play to call.
Good UF. Defender has no chance to play the ball he was trying to stop the fastbreak.
The new lead was lucky here there was a foul just in front of him, in my opinion this is C primary as the new lead should be running towards the end line and get ready to receive the play and leave it to the C or T.
It was the right call. C didn't call it. The right call comes before the mechanics.
In my opinion it shouldn't be called. Offensive player doesn't loose his RSBQ after the contact, so there is a big chance for a nice fastbreak. Probably it would be better for the game and the spectators, so it should be considered by the ref.
Unsportsmanlike foul. According to the new rules and interpetation from last year. "An unnecessary contact caused by the defensive player in order to stop the progress of the offensive team in transition". If there is a slightly contact (no U) I think we can continue a play but in this case - unsportsmanlike foul. Lead have a good point of view for this play.
Refresh comments list
You have no rights to post comments